Newly established Yale-NUS sees two countries, cultures and universities collaborating
to provide a world-class liberal arts education in Singapore. After 9 years as
Director of the Nonfiction Writing Program at The University of Iowa, Robin Hemley
is now Writer-in-Residence and Director of the Writing Program at Yale-NUS.
Robin’s own work
includes Turning Life into Fiction, an
in-depth guide to converting real life into good storytelling. The book covers
a wide range of subjects, including how to record and generate ideas from daily
life and how to write effectively using true anecdotes, real places, and real
people.
I interviewed him via e-mail.
So: questions
and answers with Robin Hemley…
What are the aims and ambitions of the
Yale-NUS creative writing program? How far are you meeting them?
We/I are
starting off modestly. At the moment, I
AM the creative writing program. I’ve
taught for 25 years in various programs and have been a program builder at
all of these places. I very much
consider myself a world citizen and have spent my career building community and
trying to build bridges between writers across boundaries. When I directed the Nonfiction Writing
Program at The University of Iowa, I founded an international conference,
NonfictioNOW, and brought writers from around the world to Iowa, then took the
conference last time to Melbourne, Australia.
I’ve spent much of the last fifteen years giving writing workshops all
over the world, from Fiji to the Philippines, and it’s always been my passion
to bring writers together. My father and
mother were both translators of the Nobel Laureate Isaac Bashevis Singer, and
while I’m not a translator, I, too, have a drive to create audiences for
writers across national boundaries. This
is what I hope to continue at Yale-NUS, in Singapore, and in the region, a
continuation of something I’ve been doing for years. This is a personal ambition. Regarding my ambitions for the program,
let’s wait and see. I hope first to
create creative writing offerings and opportunities for the students and
faculty of Yale-NUS, and beyond that, I hope to forge alliances with other
organisations that promote contemporary world literature, and see where that
takes us.
Where do the faculty come from? Asia?
The West? Do you think it matters?
As I said, I’m
the faculty in creative writing at the moment.
I was born in New York, but I’ve lived in various places around the
world, and I consider the Philippines my second home. My wife is from the Philippines and I have
many friends and family members there.
The Writers’
Centre at Yale-NUS, which I direct, has already started a reading series which
brings writers from around the world and from around the region to
Singapore. This year, we’ve brought Pico
Iyer, Gina Apostol, and Arvind Mehrotra, and Alvin Pang, to name a few, to
campus, and Alvin will be teaching a poetry course for us next year. In the future, I hope to bring visiting
distinguished writers from around the world and region to teach for periods
from a semester to a year. So, yes, it
matters. Diversity matters, and not only
diversity of national origin and ethnicity, but diversity in terms of the
traditions these writers represent and the various forms in which they
practice.
The language of tuition is English. Do you think that matters? If so,
why? If not, why not?
I’m not sure I
understand this question. I don’t know
what you mean by “the language of tuition.”
The language of tuition, as far as I can see, is the Singapore
dollar.
(Nobody wants
writers to feel they need to apologise if they choose to write in English, but
I was trying to elicit an opinion on the dominance of English; the fact that
writers in Asia writing in their mother tongues often find it difficult to find
a translator, and almost invariably find it difficult to find an
English-language publisher, and hence an English-speaking readership. I should have asked: do you
think writers in Asia feel compelled to write in English? Does that matter? )
Where do the students come from? Only from Singapore? From all over Asia? All over the world?
The students
come from all over the world. 60% are
Singaporean, and some are dual citizens.
I believe the students come from seventy different countries and six
continents.
A son or daughter going into writing is a
nightmare scenario for Asian parents.
Agree? Disagree? Would you ever attempt to change the mind of a tiger mother
who was distraught her child wanted to make a career out of writing? What, if anything, would you say to try to
win her over?
I don’t
necessarily disagree, but I also don’t think that Asian mothers are unique in
this respect. I’d say in most places in
the world, parents worry about children who go into the arts. But I also think that people who go into the
arts tend to be remarkably strong people who can’t even be dissuaded by tiger
mothers. Somehow, we do have artists and
writers in the world, and many great ones come from Asia. Think of all the great writers and artists
from India and China. Certainly, some of
them had to rebel against parents who didn’t want their children to waste their
lives as artists. But I’m not a
proselytiser and I don’t see it as my role to intervene between a tiger mom (or dad) and her child. I wouldn’t want my
child to become an economist, and if I argued with my child about this, and
said, “Why do you want to waste your life as an economist?” I wouldn’t expect
her economics prof (spawn of the devil, no doubt) to try to talk me out of my
opposition. Why should I be any
different? If she truly wanted to become
an economist, I imagine she’d find a way with or without my approval, and that
would be the first test of her commitment to her chosen field. If I were able to talk her out of being an
economist and she instead followed the family tradition and became a writer,
I’d say she probably didn’t want to be an economist all that much in the first
place. I feel the same way about writers
who must face the opposition of their parents to do what they want to do.
Do you think writing can be called a
profession?
Of course it’s a
profession, but only a tiny fraction of writers solely support themselves by
their writing. The writer Lewis Hyde
wrote an important book a couple of decades ago called The Gift, in which he argues that writing and art in general needs
to be looked at as more than a commodity, but as a gift to society by the
artist. We can’t judge art and say, a
soft drink, by the same standards. Some artists make plenty of money in their
lifetime from their writing and art, but they’re a rarity. The point is that art can’t be judged by how
popular it is necessarily or by how much money it makes. Writing can be seen as
a profession, certainly, but that’s not all it is. It’s an artistic pursuit.
Do many of your Yale-NUS students want to
set up shop as writers? Or are most of
them doing this to fulfill an interest they don’t see lasting long beyond their
student years?
I wouldn’t want
to generalise about my students or presume to know what they’re thinking at
this point. Yale-NUS just started and my
students are ALL Freshmen. I don’t think
most people know what they want when they’re Freshmen. It’s not my job to recruit writers, to make tiger moms hate me for luring their children to the dark side. It’s
my job to offer opportunities and to teach writing. What my students do with this is up to
them. But I should add that I believe
that people who learn how to express themselves imaginatively in writing are
going to be able to use those same skills in whatever profession they go
into. I’m not only teaching them how to
write, but how to think creatively – or at least, I’m allowing them to think creatively – something that’s too often
discouraged – and that’s something that will serve them well throughout their
lives.
If you have students who do want to set
up as professional writers, do you feel honour bound to try to dissuade them?
No, why would I
do that? It’s not a cult. But you have to define your terms here. What do you mean by “professional” writer? The idea of a professional poet, for
instance, is almost absurd. There are
some few poets who make a living after many years with speaking engagements,
but most poets hold down another job.
One of the most famous Western poets, Wallace Stevens, worked for an
insurance company. Another, William
Carlos Williams, was a doctor. There’s
no reason why you can’t write and do something else. Some writers, such as myself, go into
academia, but others hold down all sorts of other jobs. They’re not mutually exclusive, but if you
want to write seriously, you have to find a job that allows you the time and
energy to write. Straight out of
graduate school, I had a 9-5 job for a year and a half in Chicago. The job was the kind at which I could do what
I needed to do and then spend much of the rest of the day writing without in
any way compromising my effectiveness in my job. I wrote half the stories in my first
collection at that job. My thoughts on
this subject boil down to this:
1.
If
you want to write, you’ll write.
2.
You
probably won’t earn a living at it. But . . .
3.
See
number 1.
How do you feel
about preparing students for a profession where most practitioners can expect
to earn peanuts if they’re lucky, and nothing if they’re not? Do you ever worry creative writing courses are
immoral, in producing a massive over supply of writers the world doesn’t need?
Immoral? Are philosophy courses immoral? Are literature classes immoral? What’s immoral about learning how to write? I’d say it’s more immoral teaching people
that art is frivolous and that you should only care about money. In fact, studies have shown that these
immoral writers the world doesn’t need actually make people more compassionate
and smarter: writing and reading both achieve this. The mistake, again, is to think that all
writers need to make a living at writing just because they’ve taken a few
college courses in it. Certainly, it
would be immoral to tell someone they’re so talented that they should quit all
their other studies and simply become poets, but who does that? I wouldn’t do such a thing, nor would anyone
I know, but if someone comes to me and wants to learn something about writing,
I’m happy to share everything I know.
I should also
add that I know a lot of writers. Most
of them seem as happy as anyone I know and they lead fulfilling lives. At some point or another someone has tried to
dissuade them from writing, I’m sure. My
good friend Bret Lott was told by one graduate school teacher that he had made
a mistake and that he should not become a writer (the teacher thought he was
acting morally, I suppose). Bret went
home to his wife dejected and told her what his teacher had said, and his wife,
Melanie told him she wasn’t going to let him quit after they’d moved across the
country to be there. Bret is now more
famous than his teacher ever was – about fifteen years ago, Oprah picked one of
Bret’s novels for her famous book club.
Another friend of mine, the Hong Kong writer Xu Xi (a classmate of
Bret’s as it turns out), took another route.
After grad school, she worked for many years in the corporate world,
mostly in Asia, before leaving it with enough earnings so she didn’t have to be
too concerned with money. Meanwhile, she
pursued her writing career and is now one of Hong Kong’s leading writers. In other words, there are many different
routes to writing, none of them easy, but for some of us, absolutely
fulfilling.
There is no money in Asian Books Blog,
and nobody ever gets paid to contribute, so, to be fair, I should ask if you in
turn think I am immoral for asking
writers to write for nothing?
No. Actually, I’ve written on this subject. For
free. There are some things we’re
willing to write for free and some things we aren't willing to write for
free. Joan Didion once said that if no
one paid her to write, she would never write, but most of us aren’t Joan
Didion. It’s certainly better if you can
pay writers, but sometimes exposure is worth as much as money and sometimes we
write for free because we believe the subject is important and we have thoughts
on it.
Do you think writing for the public for nothing
can only ever be out of vanity?
No, more often
than not, it’s out of generosity, I think.
When we speak, do we only speak out of vanity? Writing is a form of communication, and the
reasons for communication are complex and myriad. There’s never one reason for it.
What do you think about blogging / digital media / social networking etc., all
of which increase writers’ freedom and ability to get their work out there, but
undermine their ability to get paid? Do
you think overall the trade-offs work for or against writers? And should anybody care, apart from writers?
Not everyone writes to get
paid, though sometimes it works out for writers, and most often it
doesn’t. That’s no different from the
way it’s been for centuries. Regardless
of the media or platform, that’s not going to change.
Anything else you want to say? Anything you think I should have asked, but
didn’t?
You should come
to some of our readings. In fact, anyone
reading this within shouting distance of Singapore should come to the
readings. They’re open to the
public. We don’t have our full slate of
visitors set up for 2014/15 yet, but we’ll
have the slate of readers available by June 2014 at the latest and
people can email me directly to find out who is reading and when, if they’re
interested. We’d gladly welcome the
public to our readings and receptions.
